Student at desk black and white
Collection

How Can I Promote Academic Integrity With AI?

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked renewed concern about academic integrity.  Here, we recommend resources to help you consider ways to promote academic integrity in your courses, whether you choose to encourage or discourage the use of AI.

Updated June 2026
Jess Taggart headshot
Assistant Director & Assistant Professor
Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost
View Bio

Promoting Academic Integrity in Your Course

Cornell University

Cornell University describes three concrete strategies for promoting academic integrity in your courses, with special consideration then given to AI.

Headshot of Jess Taggart
Jess Taggart
This is an excellent place to start as you consider how to foster a learning environment grounded in trust and academic integrity. The suggestions provided are immediately useful and relevant across disciplines.
View excerpt
Seemingly every year, there is a new platform or website that prompts us to think about how we are assessing student learning and how we can ensure that students are demonstrating what they know with integrity. What follows are several strategies for promoting academic integrity, as well as some specific information on Artificial Intelligence tools (or AI tools, e.g., ChatGPT) that may help inform how you assess learning and create a learning environment that fosters trust and academic integrity.
Was this resource helpful?

Documenting and Citing AI

UVA Library

This University of Virginia Library Guide provides guidance on how to cite generative AI models in three popular styles: APA, MLA, and Chicago.

Headshot of Jess Taggart
Jess Taggart

I appreciate how this guide focuses on a practical challenge many of us now face, both inside and outside the classroom: how to promote transparency and responsible attribution when AI is part of our learning processes and workflows. This is an easy-to-share resource that can help instructors move from saying, "be sure to cite your AI use" to offering concrete expectations and guidelines.

View excerpt

The Generative Part of GenAI

Working with generative AI presents unique challenges due to its dynamic and ever-changing nature. Unlike traditional sources, generative AI content is constantly evolving, which makes replicating queries, responses, and results difficult. This constant change highlights the importance of thoroughly documenting your use of generative AI in your research, including not only citations but also maintaining a record of the specific queries and responses you've used.

To overcome these challenges and ensure the accuracy and replicability of your work, it's crucial to save and archive all relevant information related to your generative AI interactions. This includes storing your initial queries, AI-generated responses, and any other contextual details that could help demonstrate your use of generative AI. This ensures transparency in the research process and, paired with citations, maintains the integrity of your research and supports your findings in the face of AI's inherent unpredictability.

Was this resource helpful?

The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI

Tricia Bertram Gallant and David A. Rettinger

This book argues that the most effective response to academic dishonesty is to refocus on student learning through course and assessment design, motivation, and relationships. Drawing on research on academic integrity, the authors offer practical strategies to help students learn with integrity.

Headshot of Jess Taggart
Jess Taggart

I appreciate how this book is simultaneously a useful review of the literature on academic integrity while also being immediately practical. It is a great book to read with colleagues to jump-start productive conversations about academic integrity. This book was not intended to be about AI when first written, and it nicely highlights that academic integrity concerns are not new; the emergence of generative AI tools are simply the latest challenge that needs thoughtful, intentional action.

View excerpt

In these days of an ever-expanding internet, generative AI, and term paper mills, students may find it too easy and tempting to cheat, and teachers may think they can’t keep up. What’s needed, and what Tricia Bertram Gallant and David A. Rettinger offer in this timely book, is a new approach—one that works with the realities of the twenty-first century, not just to protect academic integrity but also to maximize opportunities for students to learn.

The Opposite of Cheating presents a positive, forward-looking, research-backed vision for what classroom integrity can look like in the GenAI era, both in cyberspace and on campus. Accordingly, the book outlines workable measures teachers can use to better understand why students cheat and to prevent cheating while aiming to enhance learning and integrity.

Bertram Gallant and Rettinger provide practical suggestions to help faculty revise the conversation around integrity, refocus classes and students on learning, reconsider the structure and goals of assessment, and generally reframe our response to cheating. At the core of this strategy is a call for teachers, academic staff, institutional leaders, and administrators to rethink how we “show up” for students, and to reinforce and fully support quality teaching, learning, and assessment. With its evidentiary basis and its useful tips for instructors across disciplines, levels of experience, and modes of instruction, this book offers a much-needed chance to pause, rethink our purpose, and refocus on what matters—creating classes that center human interactions that foster the personal and professional growth of our students.

Was this resource helpful?

Want to recommend a resource to add to this collection? Send us an email.